Tweak Your Biz

Home » Marketing » Dark Social Explained – What It Means For Your Website Traffic Analytics

Dark Social Explained – What It Means For Your Website Traffic Analytics

As marketers we live and die by our data (or at least we should!). All decisions made are based on data.

For example, if we see that a large number of people are coming to our website via organic traffic for the term ‘facebook for b2b’ we know that topic is of huge interest to our visitors, and that if we wrote more blog posts on Facebook for B2B, or released an ebook entitled Successfully Using Facebook For B2B Marketing, that we would boost traffic even further. So, data is important.

Dark Social

Most analytics programs, whether Google Analytics or your own CMS analytics, will give you a breakdown of your traffic as follows:

  • Organic;
  • Direct;
  • Referrals;
  • Social Media;
  • Paid; and
  • Campaigns.

Although this gives you a lot of information, all may not be what it appears. When someone sees a link on Facebook, to your latest blog post for example, clicks on it and goes and reads the blog post on your website, they bring with them a little tracking code that tells your analytics that they came from Facebook. Simple. However what happens if someone IMs or emails their friend a link to your blog post and they click on that? That will show up in your analytics as ‘direct traffic’ because that person came via the direct url. So despite it being, in human terms, an obviously ‘social click’, analytics programs don’t see it as such, and this is where we start to hear the term ‘dark social’ crop up.

What Is ‘Dark Social’?

The term dark social was first coined last October by Alexis Madrigal of The Atlantic in his article Dark Social: We Have the Whole History of the Web Wrong. The term has now been picked up by the mainstream and is generally used to refer to traffic that comes from sources such as:

  • Instant message shares;
  • Email shares;
  • Bookmark shares;
  • Forums;
  • Local hub sites; and
  • People moving from a secure site (https://) to a non-secure site (http://).

This, as you can imagine, can cover a huge amount of traffic, and can, by and large, be characterised as ‘social traffic’, despite not being tagged as such by your analytics. Instead your analytics are probably showing you that some 30-50% of your website visits are coming via direct traffic, and even if you block the IP addresses of your staff, that direct traffic figure is likely to remain quite high – all because of this ‘dark social’ traffic.

Why Is It Important?

As marketers we spend huge amounts of time figuring out how to increase our website traffic and improve lead generation. We plan out how we will present ourselves on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google+, Pinterest etc. treating each social platform different, as they should be, and tailoring the way we engage with fans and what content we publish. However if, like the apparent majority of websites, up to half of your visits are coming via ‘dark social’ then you need to be factoring that into the equation as well. Just because you can’t neatly quantify this type of social traffic the same way you can with your ‘twitter traffic’ doesn’t mean it’s not important.

Fortunately, as it is still social, the key is still to create great content that people want to share with others. So if you are already creating great content that is interesting and shareable, then you are already catering to the dark social masses.

What Can Marketers Do About Dark Social?

It’s much harder to understand this traffic and how to cater for it, but it is important to understand that it exists and that your ‘direct traffic’ and ‘social traffic’ numbers, according to your analytics program, are not necessarily accurate. As Madrigal pointed out in his blog post, there is no easy answer.

The first step has been to acknowledge its existence and now programmers are trying to work out how to at least identify some of this traffic. It is important to remember however, as BuzzFeed put it, that “all dark social traffic is direct traffic but not all direct traffic is dark social, and at the moment it is unclear just how much direct traffic is dark social.

One way to at least reduce some of the dark social numbers would be to start using tracking urls in all your campaigns, so that you can tell if someone gets to a specific landing page as a result of that email you just sent out, rather than their click merely ending up in the direct traffic bucket of your analytics.

The Future Of Dark Social

Indications are that dark social should decrease as more and more people, particularly millenials, are choosing to share using social media, rather than email. So, if you use tracking urls, that combined with a downward trend in sharing via email, should see a reduction in your direct traffic numbers over time, and hopefully our analytics programs will soon be able to show us more accurate data for our direct traffic sources.

The important thing to remember is, if you continue to create great content that people want to share, you’ll be catering for the unknown quantity of ‘dark social’ visits out there … so don’t be afraid of the dark!

Did you like this article? Sign up for our RSS, join us on Facebookon Twitter and on Google+ to get the latest Tweak Your Biz articles and updates.

Images:  “Dark Network Background /

Sarah Ryan is an Online Marketing & Communications manager with 7 years experience. After being located in San Francisco for 2 years, Sarah returned to Dublin in early 2012.

Similar Articles
  • Thanks so much for this post Sarah – I hadn’t heard about Dark Social before but now I know what it’s all about

  • Thanks Sian. Glad I managed to explain it clearly enough for you 🙂

  • Your last line is very pertinent: how millenials are using social media messaging – i for one can testify to doing the same myself with Twitter/ FB messenger/google chat etc.. not ot mention whatsapp as a text substitute – hopefull we will be less in the dark than we used to be.

    Will we ever get to the point when we can say there shall be no such thing as a Direct Click in the future?

  • Maybe, but not with the tech that’s around atm.

  • Interesting post Sarah, thanks for sharing

  • Agreed Neil. But I suspect the tech is already being worked on as a result of the dark social chatter over the last few months. Whichever analytics system shows they can quantify even some of the dark social traffic will have a significant edge over their competitors.

  • A great post Sarah, and explained so well.
    I won’t be afraid of the dark now 🙂

  • Sheila Averbuch

    I find that I am more likely to share content socially now than before, since I got my Google plus up and running; I was never happy “logging in with twitter” (as I have too many different twitter identities) and I never certainly wanted to login as Facebook, which is completely personal. What are your views Sarah on whether the rise of Google plus this year will have an effect on social sharing and dark social?

    Sheila Averbuch-ENNclick

  • lachoo1932

    Thanks… Niche post about email and social media… direct traffic.. give good thought.

  • Thanks Elaine. All we need is a little light shone on something to make it a little less scary 🙂

  • Hi Sheila. Thanks for reading. I know that Goolge+ has released new figures showing an increase in use, but it’s still not a major player in the social platform stakes, yet anyway. Traffic sent from G+ is tracked, as with all visits from social media, so it won’t be categorised as ‘dark social’.

  • Derbhile Graham

    Very interesting. Never knew about this. Will keep an eye on how it develops. Thanks.

Featured Author
© Copyright 2009-2018, Bloggertone LLC. All rights reserved.