Tweak Your Biz » Marketing » Is Marketing Dead? May It Rust In Peace

Is Marketing Dead? May It Rust In Peace



I recently read a post by Bill Lee, ”Marketing is Dead“, on the Harvard Business Review blog talking about the death of traditional marketing. Of course, even at this early stage you’re probably muttering ‘Well duh! Digital is where it’s at.’ I disagree with you though. Marketing strategy through PR and advertising as we know it is dying regardless of whether it’s online or off.

Worry not…

Is it time for marketers to hang up their boots? Absolutely not. I’m a marketer myself and while some may be worried by the statements in the first paragraph I view it as a fantastic challenge. Now we are going to have to work harder to justify a marketing spend and ultimately show real impact on the bottom line.  Currently we tend to veer down one of two paths:

a) do we work harder to come up with more unique and impactful promotional messages and channels?

Or

b) do we strip it right back and put that money into more tangible approaches such as special offers?

Marketing Strategy

Back to the Marketing of the Swinging 60s

There is a third approach – and it comes full circle from the swingin’ 60s.

In the 60s marketing trends revolved around product quality. There was an assumption that if the product quality was high enough people would consume. Unlike today it did not revolve around ramming it down people’s throats harder than the competition or involve the art of convincing people they have a need for something they would never normally purchase.

Product quality meant invaluable positive word-of-mouth and a greater chance of a repeat purchase if applicable.

Losing Assumptions

This is what product marketers today need to work on. In order to focus on this approach you have lose a few basic beliefs:

  • People are not stupid. If your tagline boasts about being the best they won’t believe it. People need proof. They believe you are the best if they actually think your product is the best.
  • By rubbishing some of your current strategies you are not cannibalising your role – your securing it for the future and making it easier to prove your worth.
  • By not putting big money into above-the-line people will not automatically think you’ve disappeared off the face of the planet or that the competition has taken you out.
  • Take responsibility and forget the old adage that the marketer brings the customer to the table and the sales team closes it. Marketers must be accountable for the whole process as should sales. Your 7 p’s has to align with the product and the quality must justify a repeat purchase.

So what do we do?

I’m not totally rubbishing traditional and above-the-line marketing, but increasingly it is done for the sake of it.  I call a lot of this stuff ‘vanity marketing’ i.e. splurging huge amounts of cash on impressive looking collateral that has little impact on the bottom line.

Quality must rule. Develop a great product that people need; help them find it and facilitate C2C marketing. That’s the way!

I currently have to take a look at my marketing strategies and here’s some points that I’ll be taking into consideration.

My Marketing Strategy

#1. Incentivise

How do I track my ROI to a greater extent going forward e.g. if you do a campaign to try and switch cash customers to DD by incentivising, will I track the immediate switch plus the fall-off of the switchers at the period of the second payment i.e. the long term ROI.

An immediate impact does not mean ‘JOB DONE!’. Perhaps incentivising is damaging anyway? If I have a quality product why try so hard?

#2.  How can I facilitate word-of-mouth?

Product placement with celebrities may have an impact with high-end couture. In reality, give some free products to influential people in the community that won’t be accused of just being paid for it. Use people who engage with you on social networks. Look at the power of Trip Advisor in restaurant selection. Get them talking about your product and more importantly take their advice on improvements. They are actual customers and other customers will take their lead.

Will I buy a Prius because Brad Pitt says I should? God no. Will I buy a petrol sucking BMW because my brother tells me it has great performance? Most definitely.

#3.  Pilots

Have you tried out your current digital and traditional messaging? Prove to yourself it works if you disagree with me e.g. is the purpose a press campaign to generate inbound calls to a centre? Put one advertisement in a tabloid, one in a broadsheet and one in an email – now put three different numbers on the ads and see which channel generates the most calls. No, it doesn’t end there…

Sit with sales. What feedback are you getting from inbound calls? Perhaps some of them found it misleading or irrelevant e.g. in telecoms, price is king. Did your messaging help outbound calls i.e. were people like ‘Ah yea I seen that somewhere today.’ This applies to all walks of advertising. Do the value-add returns make it worthwhile?

I work in telecoms and technology targeted at an agri audience. Very few of our customers are digital natives, but many are still saturated with marketing messages. I’ve found that using customers to help me write genuine advertorials and stories work better. Coming back to point 2,  a set-up photo shoot or trying to convince a journalist to cover a press release telling people they need to purchase my product with a quote from a ‘suit’ is not a worthy approach.

#4.  Align yourself with all processes and people in the business

For example, if you are a product marketing manager with B2B2C type digi products, you have to think about it from zero to hero. You have to think about what the client wants for their customer; then you have to align with their current digital strategy, but in such a way that their customers are going to find it and use it.

You are responsible for the quality; making sure that the product is found and facilitating the natural process of word-of-mouse. As I stated earlier: ‘Quality must rule. Develop a great product that people need; help them find it and facilitate C2C marketing.’

Conclusion

So much of our time as marketers is wasted running from deadline to deadline. We need to take a step back and we need to look at the product itself. Honestly, in your heart of hearts, what do you think of the product? Have you really listened to your target audience’s view? Have you facilitated consumer-to-consumer marketing? SEM and social media has made ‘Word-of-mouse’ an almighty force. Even in the offline world you can still facilitate it.

The paradigm of the marketing role hasn’t changed for many marketers, but it has for the consumer. Are you wasting buckets of money on keeping a message out there that no listens too for a product no one wants?

I don’t know about you, but I think we can learn a lot from the marketers of the 60s and I’m beginning to believe that as marketers we need to close our mouths and open our ears.

What’s your view? Are you focusing too much on channel and message rather than the offering itself? How has your strategy changed to reflect the almighty power of peer-to-peer?

Did you like this article? Sign up for our RSS and/or Follow us on Google+

Images: “gravestone on the white background Shutterstock.com



The Author:

Get in touch - t: @Con_Keppel w: www.about.me/connorkeppel ME: Marketing Manager, SaaS; co-founder of FobaJob.com; Social Media Junkie; MSc in Strategic Management; Opinions my own and they may offend (not intentionally of course). http://fobajob.com

Add Your Comment

  • http://twitter.com/xcelbusiness Helen Cousins

    Connor
    I like the challenging view of marketing in this post. In reality, this should have been the case all along => “we are going to have to work harder to justify a marketing spend and ultimately show real impact on the bottom line.” But it hasn’t been so.
    In overall terms with regard to the success of a business, marketing matters. A lot. But for too long, if a business was doing well, large spends have not been questioned. Could a lesser spend have achieved the same, less or even more? The “splash the cash” marketing approach is why some accountants view marketing folk as “luvvies” and why marketing folk regard some accountants as bean counters.
    Small point on writing/ editing, I think you may have got into a double negative hole there in one paragraph and said the opposite of what you meant? “you have to lose a few basic beliefs” then => “people are not stupid”. But I think you don’t want us to believe / continue to believe that people are stupid? (Ditto for other points in that paragraph). Maybe it’s just me, but I got confused!

    No spend is sacred. Challenge is good. Measurement is better.

    Great post Connor!
    ~ Helen

  • http://www.connorkeppel.com Connor Keppel

    Thanks Helen, all good points and thanks for the tip re: the double negative. I want us to stop believing people are stupid. I also think a lot of marketers negative views are based on the fact that accountants often don’t buy into the fact that you have to take risks when trying new marketing strategies.

  • http://twitter.com/#!/antonmccarthy Anton McCarthy

    Hi Connor,

    Interesting post which brings up a number of different points. First up, I’m a marketer and I don’t think people are stupid :) I do think though that what is happening is that new channels enabled by the internet are making businesses more honest, and motivating them to take a long look at their products and services with a view to making them the best they can be. This is good for everyone. It’s becoming an increasingly competitive world, and when consumers can simply do a quick Google search to learn mostly all they need to know about a company, it should encourage businesses to sit up and take account of the image being projected about them online. So, it’s no longer enough to say ‘we can do X’, or ‘we can provide you with Y’ – because it’s easy to see at a glance whether your online presence backs up these claims.

    On traditional marketing and PR dying out, I don’t think this is true at all. I would say the rumours of its demise are greatly exaggerated! I think in many cases articles such as the HBR one are marketing strategies in themselves, and straightforward link-bait when applied to digital. Advertising and PR are multi-billion dollar industries, and people will always want to advertise in the paper, on TV, radio, etc – because broadcast media still has a place, and it’s really all about integrating traditional marketing strategies with the newer channels, be they digital or otherwise. You yourself even mention testing your marketing approaches through advertising in newspapers in point #3 ;)

  • http://www.facebook.com/tiroberts1986 Ti Roberts

    This was a great read. It really made me think. I’m in the process of revamping my digital ebook product and also creating a bonus to go along with the affiliate product I promote. I liked when you said:

    “Take responsibility and forget the old adage that the marketer brings the customer to the table and the sales team closes it. Marketers must be accountable for the whole process as should sales. Your 7 p’s has to align with the product and the quality must justify a repeat purchase.”
    In my business model, I see myself as the marketer and the seller so this statement resonates with me. I’ll be taking your article into consideration as I’m going through my product re-creation process.
    Thanks for sharing!

    Ti

  • http://www.connorkeppel.com Connor Keppel

    Hi Anton, great points. Not sure about the link-bait comment though. I would agree that there are exaggerations but the way in which public relations etc. is conducted and its effectiveness are changing. We as consumers are continually getting more savvy and companies who engage in techniques like product placement etc. are getting more and more public evaluation e.g. Heineken and Bond. Regardless of channel or message or ROI, the old values of quality, value and something unique communicated to you by a peer who’s opinion you respect is far more powerful than anything generated (generally) by the marketing department. The internet has allowed that message to be almost mass communicated through social networks in an organic method. Its the marketers job now in my opinion to get more commercially aware in terms of spotting opportunities and influencing the product or service development phase to meet the needs of the market so that organic influence can be foreseen and fostered from concept to reality.

    Once could argue that if senior management spot a gap in the market, its the marketer’s job to spot the market in the gap.

    Thanks for reading Anton.

    Connor

  • http://www.connorkeppel.com Connor Keppel

    You’re very welcome Ti and thanks so much for reading. Do share you product and plans with us in the near future :-)

    Connor