Tweak Your Biz » Management » The Post Office: Lessons Learned From A Leadership Catastrophe

The Post Office: Lessons Learned From A Leadership Catastrophe



Recently the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) announced it would stop delivering mail on Saturdays.  It is expected to save $2 billion a year, a drop in the bucket compared to the $16 billion loss reported in 2012.  Besides the staggering annual loss, the USPS twice defaulted on payments totalling $11 billion in 2012 and it exhausted a $15 billion line of credit from the U.S. Treasury. So…what can you learn about leadership from such a sad story?

Leadership

First, let’s look at the situation.  There are three key problems that would cause the reasonable person to believe the USPS is irreparably flawed:

# 1. Bureaucracy

The recent no-Saturday delivery decision has been kicked around for years, but when it was approved recently by the House Oversight and Reform Committee, some members of Congress questioned the authority of that Committee.  Interestingly, Saturday service was cut in 1957, only to have President Eisenhower reverse the decision only three days after it was announced; bowing to political pressure.  Net, clear authority is non-existent.

The federal government also demands that the USPS provide “affordable” service to remote locations.  For example, a 4 pound package from New York City to White Owl, S.D. costs $20.51 via UPS, but only $12.07 via USPS.  Don’t you think that someone living in a remote area realizes there are plusses and minuses to living there?  Like the fact that it will be expensive for someone to deliver a package there!

# 2. Nonsensical Business Model

Decades ago, the USPS decided to build its future on a lucrative 1st class letter business, and to deliver junk mail and magazines well below cost.  Today things are just as bazaar.  For example, it is estimated that delivery of a first class letter costs more than twice what we pay today.  Additionally, business journalist Dale Eggar recently noticed that for a piece of oversized and overweight junk mail he received the sender had only paid 15 cents for its delivery.  He took it to the post office and found that if he sent such a piece, the USPS would charge him $1.08.  What justifies such a huge discount for junk mailers? Basically the USPS has never really developed a reasonable pricing strategy.

The package delivery business has exploded over the years, and while the USPS ignored it, companies like Fed EX and UPS have ridden it to glory.  While the USPS is now working to get aggressive in this area, mindless pricing and political intervention demanding unaffordable services are clearly rampant.

# 3. Leaderless

Today there are so many government parties that believe, or actually do, have some responsibility for the USPS that the result is nobody does.  There is no single person that has the authority and responsibility to drive the organization to success.  While the USPS Postmaster General is the so-called USPS CEO, as noted above, to drive any change he has to deal with Congress and possibly the President.  The result of all this bureaucracy is that leadership is virtually impossible and there is no business plan designed to put the USPS on sound footing.

The leadership lessons are very clear:

  • Focused Authority and Responsibility: You need one person who has the authority to make decisions, and who knows he or she is responsible.  The person knows that if things don’t go well, there will be implications.  Regarding the USPS mess described above, the only way to have such authority/responsibility is to privatize.  That is exactly what several European countries did.  For example in Germany, the postal service was privatized in 1995 and it has since combined with DHL to become the world’s largest logistics company.   
  • Face Reality and Develop a Plan: For the USPS, the components of a plan for success are dead obvious.  For starters, price the services to reflect the costs and then for each service, see if the public is interested or not.  If not, either modify it to be of interest or kill the service.  Also, overhaul the health/pension program which is clearly not affordable.
  • Staff for Success: For any organization to be successful, you need a performance appraisal system that rewards excellent performance and puts poor performers on a path to significantly improve or be terminated.  The USPS is hamstrung by a seniority-oriented union.

One more obvious lesson for aspiring leaders: Beware of taking a job with the government!

Did you like this article?  

Tweak Your Biz

  1. Please share it with your network, we’d really appreciate it! 
  2. Would you like to write for Tweak Your Biz? Or sign up for our RSS?
  3. An outstanding title can increase tweets, Facebook Likes, and visitor traffic by 50% or more. Generate great titles for your articles and blog posts with the Tweak Your Biz Title Generator.

Connect with Tweak Your Biz on:                      

Images:  ”Red mail box with heap of letters. / Shutterstock.com



The Author:

Bob is an author, public speaker and retired executive vice president and chief operating officer (COO) of Microsoft Corporation. Before joining Microsoft, he spent twenty six years at Procter & Gamble, the last five of those years as senior vice president of advertising and information services. Since retirement, Bob has divided his time between working as a consultant for his own Herbold Group LLC and as writer and public speaker focusing on leadership. Bob has written three books. His latest, "What's Holding You Back? 10 Bold Steps That Define Gutsy Leaders" was released February 2011 by Wiley/Jossey-Bass. http://www.bobherbold.com

Add Your Comment

  • http://tweakyourbiz.com/ Niall Devitt

    Hi Bob, another great post, and so much for many organisations to learn here. What’s frustrating is while the mess may not have been complex, no one was entrusted to figure it out and the result was all too predictable. Ultimately, that needs to be one person and not a committee but these mistakes are continuing to be repeated, and all over the world.

  • http://about.me/Lindeskog lyceum1776

    Bob: Thanks for speaking out. It is scary that if you try to compete with the stated owned postal office, they could “go postal” and put you behind bars…

  • http://www.bizsugar.com/ Heather Stone

    Hi Bob,
    Thanks for the great post. Ultimately, organizations facing competition like this need great leadership above all else, so lack of leadership simply makes this issue worse. Thanks to Sian for sharing this post with the BizSugar community.

  • Smallbiztrends

    Bob, interesting observations.

    As a rule I hate government spending — it’s a huge waste. But in the case of the U.S. Postal Service, I feel it is one of the few places where average citizens and businesses alike get daily value.

    I think the problems have been two-fold. First, the USPS was forced to set aside a huge pension fund unlike other parts of the government. Second, they keep getting hit over the head with rate increase issues that make no sense to me. To send a letter doesn’t cost that much. We can all afford to spend a few cents more and citizens ought to quit crying about it. Congresspeople (and USPS critics) are hurting us more than helping by focusing on small cost increases and not allowing the USPS to try to be competitive on the one hand, but beating on it for losses on the other hand.

    If anyone thinks it will be cheaper with private delivery services for individual letters once we drive the USPS into the ground and kill the goose that laid the golden egg, they’re nuts. It will way more expensive. And we’ll lose Saturday delivery on top of it.

    - Anita

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Val-Nostdahl/1025990186 Val Nostdahl

    In 1913 Congress was ignoring the working conditions of the workers of the United States Post Office, they decended on DC, in a mass protest, which eventually led to the collective bargaining process a way of settling disputes between management and labor, in 1935 the right to unionize was made law after extreme situations between labor and management which contributed to the stock market crash in the country and ushered in the dirty 30s , most employers before that did not believe in unions and would not hire, thus the state of deunionizing American workers, and not having a strong economy or a middle classs.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Val-Nostdahl/1025990186 Val Nostdahl

    In 1970 congress was again ingnoring the plight of Postal Employees working conditions, where most did not earn a decent wage or have benifits for working , and many worked 3 jobs to survive, or were on welfare, working for the USPO which was behind in paying a fair days wage for a fair days work, so the great postal strike took place, and after the dust had settled, the workers in the USPO began to get wage increases and benfits keeping up with the private sector, the collective bargaining rights were re-enforced to enable this in the postal system and the no strike law came in to being and the USP0 was changed to the USPS taken out of the Presidents cabinet where before many of the managers of the post office were politcal appointees and could and did have greed and graft to run the USPS, with this the USPS was to operate more like a business model .

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Val-Nostdahl/1025990186 Val Nostdahl

    In 2000, 2001, postal employees were made to pay in an extra 15 percent to their retirment systems known as fers, or federal employee retirement system and csrs or civil service retirment system the older stystem that did not include social security for workers, where fers is 3 teir aide in retirment, social security, retirement and matching funds if desired of a 401 k, out of employees checks the retirment comes with matchinf funds from the USPS, the extra 15 percent was paid in under the 1997 budget reconcilation act, for budget reasons only, and the postal workers were thanked by both the President and Congress for their ‘sacrfice” at a time when Americans were getting tax cuts they had a tax increase . The Increase was removed from the Presidents budget in 2002, and new legislation began plus a report to Congress that the USPS had paid in full its obligation to the fers and csrs and also overpaid or overfunded the retirment accounts, fers was overfunded by 15 billion and csrs by 140 billion.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Val-Nostdahl/1025990186 Val Nostdahl

    The new legislation was passed by voice vote not even read really into existance in 2006, basically because the retirment systems had been overpaid, or overfunded it was felt it monies were distrubuted back this would increase the deficit, so therefore the amount to be given back which amounted to about 5 billion a year, was instead charged to the USPS profits and set aside in an escrow account for the USPS to meet the obligation of retirments for workers not hired or born yet for the next 75 years in a 10 year window from 2006 until 2016, since the USPS had overpaid and overfunded the other two retirment accounts. This was called the Postal Accounitiblity and Enhancement Act of 2006, signed in to law by the President at that time.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Val-Nostdahl/1025990186 Val Nostdahl

    with the event of the PAEA, as written it also included pay per performance increase for top managment since it was deemed they wanted to keep excutives and pay them in the comparable private market, so the PMG Potter at that time in 2006 recieved an increase of 72 thousand a year in pay, more benifits and proceeded to make over the cap pay of the vice president since that was stipulated by law in his pay, so doubled his pay and salary from 400,000 a year to 800,000 a year twcie what the President of the United States makes and got a retirment package in 2010 worth 5, 5 million dollars ( I believe anually) so did the rest of the 12 top executives meanwhile due to the paea non replacment of attrition due to overpaid retirment , began to take place in the lower craft or labor employees known as federal taxpayers, who had an increase of tax and now were being basiclaly being told non replacmeent of people workign with them sometimes on a 3 to 1 ration where they are expected to do more for the same amount of money, so working staff below top executives and managment are having increased stress in the workforce due to the paea. For information to read up on the matter the link to the American Postal Workers Union, 3800 first area tricounty local, PA , library can be read online, in the stress in the workplace artical copywritten in 2008, called, ” How the ongoing violation of the USPS guiding principles are creating a toxic work enviroment. “

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Val-Nostdahl/1025990186 Val Nostdahl

    the us labor deptarment is in charge under the post master general for the running and managment of the USPS, followed by postmasters of which that is their union, then there is the nalc or national association of letter carriers union ( of which you can to to their website and read of the great postal strike ) and then the APWU americn postal workers union or clerking craft, and then the rra, or rural route assoicaiton workers, so in every office there are usually 4 unions and the US Labor dept is repsonsible for staffing but due to the paea is currently enforcing under the pmg non replacment of attrition due to the paea.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Val-Nostdahl/1025990186 Val Nostdahl

    post masters usually get pay per perfomance pay in order to micromange workers, thus the case of death of a letter carrier in mousouri recently last summer due to the understaffind and non repalcement of attrition, for which osha investigated due to the media coverage and fined the post office 70 thousand not the labor dept for mistreament of an employee.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Val-Nostdahl/1025990186 Val Nostdahl

    postal comments to the federal trade commision can be read online, dated august 6, 2007